| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy
Caldari State
474
   |
Posted - 2014.02.04 18:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Any numbers or information beyond the fact of being irrelevant would mean even less should they be provided by you.
All the testing from both sides still wonGÇÖt change a thing.
All your crying on the forums wonGÇÖt change the fact CCP nerfed null-sec income.
Should CCP have the numbers they felt they needed to nerf hi-sec. Should they come out tomorrow and decide to nerf hi-sec guess what?..... still wonGÇÖt change a thing.
We will have to either accept it and continue to sub and play or not.
Again itGÇÖs just THAT simple.
Choose the part of the sandbox you want to play in or unsub and pick your crying towel up and go home.
So why is any information I provide meaningless? You're constantly telling me to unsub and stop posting, why is that? I provided all the tools you'd need to do exactly as I did and get numbers. The data does not lie and it shows highsec is making more than nullsec. E: To again avoid the derail, this highsec pubbie continually attempts to do. All activity reward excluding market activity should be Nullsec/WH > lowsec > highsec. So how do we nerf highsec to get it back in line?
The information provided or gathered will always be flawed. Anyone with a basic high school education will be able to know, see or even predict this. This should be obvious even more so to someone like yourself with a self proclaimed scientific testing back ground.
You are missing several key elements to test with. The first being a controlled environment. This is a sandbox with many variables to effect testing.
You are also missing Establishment/Desirability of repeatability/Attribute Agreement Analysis for Defect Databases/Accuracy/Accuracy and Precision/Reproducibility to name a few.
The most important item you lack thatGÇÖs not even scientific in nature is CREDABILITY of which you are -10.
This is why you are wasting your time. Then again I guess rocket scientist have plenty of that.
|
HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy
Caldari State
477
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 21:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Quote:
We have shown you that high sec will earn you more isk than in null and how to do it. Why do you think that it is perfectly fine for the most risk free areas of space to give better rewards than one of the most risky?
Risk free? So no one gets ganked in hi-sec any more? |
HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy
Caldari State
477
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 21:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Organic Lager wrote:
I think you messed up the quotes but i gathered that belt ratting was the worst way to make isk in null. Yet the guy I was replying to said he makes 90m/hour in bounties alone.
I'm not saying your wrong or high sec doesn't need a nerf because I don't have all the numbers so I don't know for sure. My question is why do you feel it needs a nerf when the lowest form of null sec income (belt ratting) is roughly equal to the highest form of high sec income (incursions).
Carebearing Level 4s with bounty + rewards + lp will be significantly less then 90m/hour as well.
Look at the sheet in my sig, it shows how much you can make doing mid-range combat PVE, nullsec L4s, Stoic provided data about highsec income, it boils down to: Highsec: ~100m isk/hr Nullsec: ~70m isk/hr Whoever told you that about belt ratting is not telling the truth right now it is the worst form of nullsec combat pve to the point it could be used as a negative control to compare incomes.
This is not accurate or true. Anyone who does both knows this. I make over 120m isk per/hr in null just in anoms alone. |
HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy
Caldari State
477
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 23:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Quote: We have shown you that high sec will earn you more isk than in null and how to do it. Why do you think that it is perfectly fine for the most risk free areas of space to give better rewards than one of the most risky? Risk free? So no one gets ganked in hi-sec any more? The most risk free Read before you post. So the most risk free? Then this would obviously br null-se |
HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy
Caldari State
477
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 23:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:La Nariz wrote:Organic Lager wrote:
I think you messed up the quotes but i gathered that belt ratting was the worst way to make isk in null. Yet the guy I was replying to said he makes 90m/hour in bounties alone.
I'm not saying your wrong or high sec doesn't need a nerf because I don't have all the numbers so I don't know for sure. My question is why do you feel it needs a nerf when the lowest form of null sec income (belt ratting) is roughly equal to the highest form of high sec income (incursions).
Carebearing Level 4s with bounty + rewards + lp will be significantly less then 90m/hour as well.
Look at the sheet in my sig, it shows how much you can make doing mid-range combat PVE, nullsec L4s, Stoic provided data about highsec income, it boils down to: Highsec: ~100m isk/hr Nullsec: ~70m isk/hr Whoever told you that about belt ratting is not telling the truth right now it is the worst form of nullsec combat pve to the point it could be used as a negative control to compare incomes. This is not accurate or true. Anyone who does both knows this. I make over 120m isk per/hr in null just in anoms alone. My information is true but, your information on the other hand: CURRENT CORPORATION State War Academy [SWA] from 2012.07.28 23:03 to this day You are not present on evekill, battleclinic, or zkill killboards. You are not in nullsec and you do not rat in nullsec. Provide full API to prove otherwise. E: You also still have not looked at my sheet so you don't even know what it says.
My toon is in your corp tbh  |
HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy
Caldari State
477
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 23:04:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:baltec1 wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
This is not accurate or true. Anyone who does both knows this. I make over 120m isk per/hr in null just in anoms alone.
There is nothing that will get you that amount from anoms, please post what ship you are using, its fittings, any implants and provide the same details that we have done in the spreadsheet that you still most likely have not yet read. You caught the lie too. I honest to God don't see why anyone feels the need to do this. Hell, Vindicators in Guristas space have trouble maintaining 35 mil ticks (105 mil an hour). I too would like to see this magical 120 mil an hour sub cap.
Who said I was using a sub cap? Like you I can make up any number I want...wait just now got 150m per/hr |
| |
|